mbti: (Default)
warning for mild (colored) tripophobia



ESxP ISxP ENxJ INxJ
ENxP INxP ESxJ ISxJ


KEY
blue = sensing function; initial point of concrete focus
red = intuitive function; initial point of abstract focus
hardness of shape sides = physical/mental awareness; harder means more focused on one or the other, blurred means less aware of the blurred shape/color and more aware of the background
number of shapes = less indicates seeing something as a whole, more indicates seeing something as multiple elements of substance within a larger substance
size of shapes = selectivity on what the function in question (sensor or intuitive) decides to focus on; larger indicates a bigger picture focus, smaller indicates particular focuses on details (see above with "multiple elements of substance")
direction of shapes = the evenness/adaptation relationship with what is perceived to be the extroverted function

the base shape, representing the world, is the "square." if the shapes within emulate the world (i.e. other squares within the square), this indicates an awareness of presence. other shapes (i.e. circles) indicate an alternate mode of focus - see below.

Se (Extraverted Sensing): is represented by the blue background in the top row. This indicates the physical operations needed, required, or present, and cognitive awareness of it.
Ni (Introverted Intuition): is represented by the red squares in the top row. These are points of mental focus, either in response to or in relation with the the outside world (but can get occupied within their Ni, depending... see below.) They have a fixed number and size
Ne (Extraverted Intuition): is represented by the red background in the bottom row. This indicates the ideas, possibility, and abstract openness that the mind and the outer world can go to.
Si (Introverted Sensing): is represented both by the blue circles and the direction they go to. These are points of physical focus, though since they are circles, they are beyond/not just restricted to the mental defined external possibilities as represented by the Ne, but also practical probabilities as singularly determined by this function. They are also circles because they are not as naturally immersed with what is perceived to be regular/the uncontrolled world (where Ni/Se tries to meet), but rather exists as a separate self-identified "other" world, founded on practicalities, priorities, internal established structure, focus, and needs.
Additionally, a large blue circle or a bunch of blue circles making up a larger blue circles leaves room for the red square to contrast it, as the circle is different from the square and making itself among the red background. Blue circles constructed in a square shape try to fit these practical methods with the preexisting red square world. (see below)

Read more... )
mbti: (Default)
ijs & eps exert energy, ips & ejs absorb energy, in terms of interaction not inner energy. but ijs don't start with a lot of energy in the first place so they often need Periods of Stagnation the same way ips, after they absorb energy (aux extroverted perceiving) they need time to process it bc they don't have a lot of processing/output energy. but i guess for i's then output=whatever the judging function is and input=the perceiving function while with the e is the opposite

so in that sense eps and ejs can get overwhelmed with how much energy they absorb/exert; eps can comfortably output without getting any energy input (see: how they can use up as much energy as they want without needing to interact, so enfps who are alone don't necessarily feel Lonely; eps who talk a lot/debate a lot/Do A Lot). ejs can comfortably have energy input without needing to be expressive/loud so as long as its like... an active interaction thru their dominant extroverted judging function

(i just know most ijs know r like "i'm tired i need 2 rest" but then Once Rested they're p active/acute energy, while i think ejs are like "i'm tired i need to rest" but only bc they've just been..... constantly taking things in so much and E is more naturally consistent output-input but that still gets tiring, As It Does
mbti: (Default)
happy 2017! here is another theory i've been polishing up in my head.

basically all of the types would see this as a benefit in their ideal situation - not Always i guess but preferred but also not strcitly perscriptive. like mbti, the preference/comfort zone:

- nts: naturally prefer brainpower but then can be prone to idealize/be interested in situations wherein they won't need to overthink
- sfs: naturally prefer not needing to use brainpower but then can be prone to idealize/be interested in deep thinking
- nfs: naturally prefer needing to use emotional/heartstuff, but then can be prone to idealize/be interested in situations where they dont need to be emotionally involved
- sts: naturally prefer not needing emotional involvement, but then can be prone ot idealize/be interested in situations where they DO need to use their heartpower shit

nts nor sfs would not mind emotional investment or lack thereof; nfs nor sts would mind brainpower or lack thereof; but overall there is a leaning (nfs and nts particularly) and a compartmentalized, separate interest. i also think nfs and nts are more prone to get buried in their preference while sfs and sts would probably be more prone to diving into their space of "lack thereof" every so often - but neither is "healthier" or "better" or "worse" than the other, more that the amount of energy spent by any is pretty much equal.

i also think that in "different" situations these can give off their opposite vibes - an NT with nothing to think about can suddenly have the physical behaviors/clumsiness/etc. of an SF; an SF with a lot of knowledge can start rattling off what they think/know with the sound of an NT. an NF who needs to Do or has a task/necessity that requires no emotion can suddenly switch into an impersonal ST mode, while an ST who is deeply emotionally affected or hurt/etc can relay or switch to a heart-sleeved NF.
mbti: (Default)
(a theory!)

nts want to be private and sometimes tell themselves that they're trying to be but ultimately are kind of bad at it i.e. while they like to see themselves and try to be private it's actually easy for ppl to understand and know them well bc nts are also kind of like... p intense to talk to

nfs understand the idea of privacy and there are defs parts of themselves that they'll keep to themselves but at the forefront they don't really care abt Exposing themselves the way nts might, i guess, and so a lot of ppl know them as well as they themselves do

sfs don't try to be private but they frequently don't really at least irl find an ease or necessity to express it as much as an nf would. they wouldn't be really even conscious of this lack of action/talking/need but basically they're like the opposite of the nt - nts want to be private but can still be easily understood by strangers if in the right circumstance/topic of discussion, while sfs don't really mind talking about/expressing themselves but unless it's like Really Important to them (as opposed to the nf where basically Most Things r important to them) they're kind of accidentally private? and only the ppl who they recognize as ppl they can Really Trust are the ones who Really understand them

and then the st is kind of... deliberately intentionally private. like ofc they'll have ppl they'll open up to and who'll understand them but at the forefront they give off some sort of aura where like, people will be able to talk about them Surface Level but not actually Understand them

Profile

mbti: (Default)
i notice the perscriptive

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
4567 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 08:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios